Skip to content

Assistant

Ask Norlan. At 03:00, without waking anyone.

Norlan answers from that equipment's own record — the manual, your procedures and its maintenance history — and shows where every part of the answer came from, so you can check it instead of trusting it.

Metal detector MD-3000

Berlin · 03:14

This unit
False rejects after the format change again. Where do I start?

Norlan

Check belt tension before the calibration: on this model it slackens after a format change. The K4 relay works loose too, and the fault comes back within the hour if it is not reseated.

Manual · p. 42Berlin · 29 JulField note · T. Walker

Is that written down anywhere?

Norlan

Yes — it became a guide in August, after the third time. Two steps, with the tension range.

Guide v2 · 8 units

  • Ask out loud
  • In your language
  • Documents and threads

Where it reads

Troubleshooting answers from the manuals you already have.

  • Manufacturer manuals12 documents
  • Drawings and schematics26
  • Your SOPs and work instructions34
  • Fault catalogues8
  • Spare parts and components410 references
  • Approved guides21
  • Field notes96
  • Line workflows and preventive rounds1,240 runs
  • Corrective history3,180 interventions
  • Machine threadslive

Check belt tension before the calibration: on this model it slackens after a format change. The K4 relay works loose too, and the fault comes back within the hour if it is not reseated.

Manual · p. 42Berlin · 29 JulField note · T. Walker

How it answers

Answers a technician can check before acting on them.

Where it gets the answer, how you check it, and what it does when the record is empty.

Grounded and cited

Every answer says where it came from

The manual page, the earlier intervention, the imported work order — shown with the answer, not behind it. And the scope follows the question: this unit, this line, or all eight machines of the model across your sites.

  • The manufacturer's manuals, loaded as they are
  • Your own procedures and past activity, ranked beside them
  • Scoped to a unit, a line or a whole model

Metal detector MD-3000

8 units · Berlin and Munich

Whole model
Has this happened on any of the others?

Norlan

Twice. Munich in March and another unit here in Berlin in June, both after a format change. In March recalibrating without re-tensioning did not hold; the belt was the cause both times.

Munich · MarchBerlin · June

  • Unit 1
  • Unit 4
  • Unit 6
  • + 5

Checking it

The citation opens the manual on the page, with the passage marked

A source you cannot open is a promise. Tap one and the document opens inside Norlan, on its page and with the passage highlighted — nothing downloaded, so no manual of yours or the manufacturer's leaves the plant. Every source that answers gets counted, and your library shows which documents earn their place. The documents, never the people.

  • Opens on the cited page, passage highlighted
  • Read inside Norlan, with no copy to download
  • Your library shows which documents answer, and which nobody needs

Operating manual · MD-3000

Page 42 of 418

Opened from an answer

After a format change, verify belt tension (45–55 N) before recalibrating.

Read in Norlan · no downloadThis page answered 7 questions this quarter

When it does not know

It says the record has nothing, and then it still helps

This is what decides whether a technician asks twice. Norlan neither goes quiet when your documentation is thin nor invents a source: it says the record holds nothing, then answers from the maintenance trade, labelled as such and with no citation — because there is none to give.

  • An answer from the record never looks like one from the trade
  • No source is invented to make an answer look solid
  • It works from the first afternoon, before anyone has written anything

The five questions to ask any assistant

Flow wrapper FW-700

Munich · 03:14

Why would the film seal open on one side only after a roll change?

This machine's record holds nothing on this

No manual passage, no earlier intervention on the FW-700, nothing on the other unit.

Answering from the maintenance trade

One-sided seal failure after a roll change usually points at web alignment or uneven sealing-bar pressure, not at temperature. Check the roll is seated square before you touch the settings.

Where answers come from

Most of it turns out to be your own team's work

The manual explains the machine as it left the factory. The swapped gearbox, the tolerance that drifted, the reset nobody wrote down — that is in your record and nowhere else, and it is why the answers keep getting better while a document assistant plateaus.

  • The manufacturer's documentation as the floor, not the ceiling
  • Your interventions ranked and cited beside it
  • The record grows from fixing things, not from documenting

Where Norlan's answers came from

Your own recorded work

Manufacturer documentation

Nothing inside — you had to ask out

Questions about the assistant

What happens when the AI does not know?

It says so. Every answer is grounded in the machines' actual record — manuals, procedures, approved guides and past activity — and cited to its source. If the record does not contain the answer, Norlan does not invent one.

Does it need our content before it is useful?

No, and it is the sharpest difference with a connected-worker platform: the manuals you already have are the first corpus, so answers start on the first afternoon. What your team writes later makes them better — it is not the price of entry.

Can it search the open web?

No. It reads your own record and nothing else: the documents you allowed, the threads, the imported history. When an answer comes from general maintenance knowledge instead, it says so and carries no citation.

Can we stop it reading certain documents?

Yes, before anything is indexed. Your administrator sets filters that block documents by name or by content: payroll, commercial, legal, whatever you name.

Can it act on our systems?

Not today, and it says so rather than pretending: asked to create a work order, it tells you the CMMS is not connected yet. Write-back is coming, and any write will need a person to approve it.

How is Norlan different from a connected-worker platform?

Connected-worker platforms standardise how operators work: instructions, checklists, skills, huddles. They are excellent at that. Norlan does one thing they do not: it keeps the memory of each machine — what failed, what was tried, what worked, and where else it applies — written while the work happens, by the technician, with the manufacturer's manual as a source. If the plant already runs one, Norlan sits next to it exactly as it sits next to the CMMS.

Why not just point a general assistant at our manuals?

A general assistant can read the manuals. It cannot say what the plant's own team tried on that machine at 03:00 last February, because nobody wrote it down for it. Norlan keeps that while the work happens, cites the manual page or the earlier intervention, and says when the record has nothing instead of inventing an answer. If the company has standardised on one assistant, Norlan can be the knowledge server it reads from.

Book a demo

A 30-minute walkthrough built around the plant's machines, not a canned demo.

We start with the operation — which failures repeat, who gets called when something breaks, what the CMMS does not hold — and then show how Norlan would work on it.

What we usually cover

  • How an incident flows today, from detection to fix
  • Where the conversation actually happens: the systems, or calls and WhatsApp
  • What takes longer — the diagnosis, or getting the right people and information together
  • How much of what a technician knows is written down, and what happens when they are away
  • Which tools are really in play: CMMS, ERP, mobile, paper
  • What a pilot would measure, and how

Pick a time that suits the plant. Bring one failure that keeps coming back.

The call is with the people who build the product, with no qualification call first. Norlan is pre-general-availability and shaped with maintenance teams in pharma and food processing.